Variant Sciatic Nerve Anatomy in Relation to the Piriformis Muscle on Magnetic Resonance Neurography: A Potential Etiology for Extraspinal Sciatica.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and clinical implications of variant sciatic nerve anatomy in relation to the piriformis muscle on magnetic resonance neurography (MRN), in patients with lumbosacral neuropathic symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, 254 sciatic nerves, from 127 patients with clinical and imaging findings compatible with extra-spinal sciatica on MRN between 2003 and 2013, were evaluated for the presence and type of variant sciatic nerves, split sciatic nerve, abnormal T2-signal hyperintensity, asymmetric piriformis size and increased nerve caliber, and summarized using descriptive statistics. Two-tailed chi-square tests were performed to compare the anatomical variant type and clinical symptoms between imaging and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Sixty-four variant sciatic nerves were identified with an equal number of right and left variants. Bilateral variants were noted in 15 cases. Abnormal T2-signal hyperintensity was seen significantly more often in variant compared to conventional anatomy (40/64 vs. 82/190; p = 0.01). A sciatic nerve split was seen significantly more often in variant compared to conventional anatomy (56/64 vs. 20/190; p < 0.0001). Increased nerve caliber, abnormal T2-signal hyperintensity, and asymmetric piriformis size were significantly associated with the clinically symptomatic side compared to the asymptomatic side (98:2, 98:2, and 97:3, respectively; p < 0.0001 for all). Clinical symptoms were correlated with variant compared to conventional sciatic nerve anatomy (64% vs. 46%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Variant sciatic nerve anatomy, in relation to the piriformis muscle, is frequently identified with MRN and is more likely to be associated with nerve signal changes and symptomatology.

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings among sciatica patients classified as centralizers or non-centralizers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare if the degenerative findings from MRI differ between the sciatica patients classified as centralizers (CEN) and non-centralizers (Non-CEN) according to the McKenzie Method of mechanical diagnosis and therapy. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: Patients (N = 100) referred to a spine clinic of a single tertiary hospital for specialist consultation for sciatica. The McKenzie-based assessment was performed by the mechanical diagnosis and therapy-trained physiotherapists. Clinical data and prevalence of lumbar MRI findings were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in leg pain intensity between the groups. The Non-CEN had significantly more intense back pain, mean 56 (SD 30) and were more disabled 44 (SD 15) compared to the CEN mean 41 (SD 25) and mean 31 (11), measured with a visual analogue scale (0-100), and the Oswestry Disability Index (0-100), respectively. The CEN had more severe degenerative findings on MRI than the Non-CEN: vertebral end-plate changes were 63% and 43%; mean Pfirrmann's disc degeneration lumbar summary score was 12.8, and 10.6; and severity score of total damage was 12.0 and 10.1, respectively. There were differences neither in disc contour changes nor nerve root stenosis on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Sciatica patients classified as non-centralizers had significantly more severe back pain, and were significantly more disabled than centralizers, who instead had more severe degenerative findings on MRI. Thus, classification to non-centralizers by the McKenzie method seems not predict higher incidence of degenerative findings on MRI compared to centralizers.

A Sciatic Neuralgia Case of an Entrapment Neuropathy Mimicking Piriformis Syndrome Due to Soft Tissue Hemangioma.

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral pain is commonly seen in daily clinical practice. In fact, entrapment of the part of the sciatic nerve after the sacral foramen causes some of these pains, which should not be overlooked. The sciatic nerve may be compressed during its course after the sacral foramen for a variety of reasons. We aimed in this article to review extra-spinal compressive sciatic neuropathy reasons and abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by presenting a sciatic neuralgia case of an entrapment neuropathy mimicking piriformis syndrome due to soft tissue hemangioma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old male patient was admitted with complaints of lumbosacral pain spreading to the leg that had been worsening over the previous 10 days. With the preliminary diagnosis of labral damage and piriformis syndrome, the patient was referred to the radiology clinic for a hip MRI. In the hip MR images, a mass lesion suggestive of heterogeneously enhanced soft tissue hemangioma after the injection of paramagnetic contrast material was observed in the proximal left thigh. The soft tissue hemangioma extends towards the obturator foramen and compresses the sciatic nerve proximal to the femur after the sciatic foramen. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of lower extremity entrapment neuropathy is frequently misdiagnosed. In these cases, MRI becomes more important for accurate diagnosis. The radiologists' knowledge of the sciatic nerve in MRI, regional anatomy during the course of the sciatic nerve, and abnormal nerve imaging findings will aid in the diagnosis.

Brain Network Changes in Lumbar Disc Herniation Induced Chronic Nerve Roots Compression Syndromes.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) induced nerve compression syndromes have been a prevalent problem with complex neural mechanisms. Changes in distributed brain areas are involved in the occurrence and persistence of syndromes. The present study aimed to investigate the changes of brain functional network in LDH patients with chronic sciatica using graph theory analysis. A total of thirty LDH adults presenting L4 and/or L5 root (s) compression syndromes (LDH group) and thirty age-, sex-, BMI- and education-matched healthy control (HC group) were recruited for functional MRI scan. Whole-brain functional network was constructed for each participant using Pearson's correlation. Global and nodal properties were calculated and compared between two groups, including small-worldness index, clustering coefficient, characteristic path length, degree centrality (DC), betweenness centrality (BC) and nodal efficiency. Both LDH and HC groups showed small-world architecture in the functional network of brain. However, LDH group showed that nodal centralities (DC, BC and nodal efficiency) increased in opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus; and decreased in orbital part of inferior frontal gyrus, lingual cortex and inferior occipital gyrus. The DC and efficiency in the right inferior occipital gyrus were negatively related with the Oswestry Disability Index in LDH group. In conclusion, the LDH-related chronic sciatica syndromes may induce regional brain alterations involving self-referential, emotional responses and pain regulation functions. But the whole-brain small-world architecture was not significantly disturbed. It may provide new insights into LDH patients with radicular symptoms from new perspectives.

[Treatment of sciatica by lumbar nerve root canal injection under X-ray angiography].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term clinical effect of lumbar nerve root canal injection under X-ray angiography in the treatment of sciatica. METHODS: The clincal data of 78 patients with sciatica underwent lumbar nerve root canal injection under X-ray angiography from December 2017 to February 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Including 31 males and 47 females, aged from 22 to 88 years old with a median of 65 years. There were 55 cases of lumbar disc herniation and 23 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, the course of disease ranged from 1 to 8 weeks with a median of 3 weeks. There were 71 cases of single segment disc herniation or stenosis, including L3,4 of 5 cases, L4,5 of 61 cases, L5S1 of 5 cases, and 7 cases of multisegment herniation or stenosis. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) was recorded and Macnab was used to evaluate the clinical effect. RESULTS: All patients completed standardized treatment without serious adverse reactions. VAS were (3.21±0.76) scores immediately after treatment, (2.89±0.33) scores 1 hour after treatment, (1.80±0.27) scores 6 hours after treatment, (1.10±0.20) scores 24 hours after treatment, (2.53±0.35) scores 1 week after treatment and (4.27±0.36) scores 1 month after treatment. There were significant differences in VAS between before treatment(7.83±0.56) and each time period after treatment(P<0.05). According to Macnab low back pain evaluation standard, 42 cases were effective, 34 cases were markedly effective and 2 cases were ineffective within 24 hours after treatment, with an effective rate of 97.4%;38 cases were effective, 25 cases were markedly effective, 15 cases were ineffective within one week after treatment, the effective rate was 80.0%;32 cases were effective, 22 cases were markedly effective, 24 cases were ineffective within one month after treatment, the effective rate was 69.2%. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical effect of nerve root canal injection under X-ray radiography in the treatment of sciatica is good and it is an effective method to relieve sciatica.

The relationship between pain and herniation radiology in giant lumbar disc herniation causing severe sciatica: 15 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate conservative treatment of giant lumbar disc herniation in patients with extreme pain and to assess temporal changes in pain levels and radiological findings with short-term follow-up. METHODS: A total of 15 patients with severe pain (as measured by visual analog scale [VAS]) due to giant lumbar disc herniation and without neurological deficits were included. All patients received conservative treatment and were followed weekly for pain and medication assessment. MRI was performed at baseline, second month and fourth month to calculate disc herniation volume. The changes in disc herniation and pain were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no relationship between pain and the regression of disc herniation in these five females and ten males with a mean age of 41.4 years. MRI results showed an average of 20.3% and 20.4% regression of disc herniation from baseline to second month, and second month to fourth month, respectively. Whereas, pain levels had reduced from an average of 90.8-13.53 by the second month, and to 3.13 by the fourth month, indicating significant success with conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the size of the herniation and the severity of the pain, patients with giant lumbar disc herniation should be encouraged to undergo conservative treatment, given that the patient does not have urinary-fecal incontinence, foot drop or progressive neurodeficit.

Extending the straight leg raise test for improved clinical evaluation of sciatica: validity and diagnostic performance with reference to the magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The straight leg raise test (SLR) is one of the most utilized and studied physical tests in patients with low back pain (LBP) for the detection of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), showing high sensitivity and heterogeneous or low specificity. The high incidence of asymptomatic 'pathologic' findings in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans may cause verification bias to these results. We studied an extended SLR (ESLR) by adding location-specific structural differentiation movements (hip internal rotation or ankle dorsiflexion) to the traditional SLR for it to better differentiate neural symptoms from musculoskeletal. Previously, the ESLR has shown almost perfect interrater reliability between examiners and ability to detect sciatic patients. In this study, we investigated whether a 'positive' ESLR finding is associated with pathology seen on MRI. METHODS: Forty subjects comprised the study population, 20 in sciatic group and 20 in control group. The ESLR was performed 'blinded' to the subjects. After the ESLR, each subject's lumbar MRI was evaluated. The MRIs were analyzed independently by 2 senior radiologists and a spine specialist clinician. The ESLR and MRI results were cross-tabulated. To obtain the odds ratio (OR) with positive ESLR or SLR results for LDH or nerve root compression (NC), a binary logistic regression analysis with subjects' age, gender, height and weight was performed. ESLR's validity was assessed by combination of interrater agreement and percentage prevalence of both LDH and NC. RESULTS: Of sciatic (ESLR+) patients, 85 % had LDH and 75 % NC in the MRI. Not surprisingly, MRI showed a very high incidence of 'false-positive' findings with the ESLR negative group. The ESLR showed 0.85 sensitivity and 0.45 specificity for LDH and 0.75 sensitivity and 0.50 specificity for NC. A positive result in the ESLR was found to be strongly associated with for both LDH and NC: the OR was 8.0 (p = 0.028) and 5.6 (p = 0.041), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ESLR shows high validity in detecting neural symptoms and is strongly associated with pathology seen in the MRI when judged positive. We suggest the use of ESLR in clinical practice as a part of clinical examination, where it may prove to be a valuable tool in detecting patients with sciatic symptoms.

Lumbosacral plexus MR tractography: A novel diagnostic tool for extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia?

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia remains a clinical challenge. MRI and MR Neurography (MRN) are currently the standard techniques used to support the diagnosis of extraspinal lumbosacral plexus entrapments; however, for the intrapelvic portions of the lumbosacral plexus their accuracy is still limited. MR Tractography (MRT) feasibility to image the lumbosacral plexus has been demosntrated, but its clinical applications have yet to be determined. PURPOSE: To correlate MRT with intraoperative findings in patients undergoing laparoscopic treatment of intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus and compare its accuracy with Neuropelveological clinical assessment and MRN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of MRT reconstructions of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences acquired for the MRN collected from a cohort of 13 patients undergoing laparoscopic detrapment of the lumbosacral plexus. The primary outcome of this study was the correlation of MRT reconstruction with intraoperative findings. Secondary outcomes included the correlation of MRN, preoperative Neuropelveological clinical diagnoses and the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) fractional anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in patients undergoing pelvic MRI and MRN for the investigation of intrapelvic nerve entrapments. RESULTS: MRT correlated with intraoperative findings in 11 of 13 patients (85%). Neuropelveological clinical assessment was able to accurately diagnose a pelvic nerve entrapment in 12/13 patients (92%) and MRN agreed with surgical findings in only 2/13 (15%) patients. MRT was significantly superior to MRN (p < 0.001). FA and ADC did not correlate with the identification of a nerve entrapment, likely due to limitations regarding the placement of the seedpoints. CONCLUSIONS: This initial, retrospective analysis, suggests that MRT is superior to MRN at diagnosing intrapelvic entrapments of the lumbosacral plexus. A prospective, double-blinded study is underway to validate this data, but these initial findings show great potential for MRT as a diagnostic tool for extraspinal sciatica and pudendal neuralgia. Clinical Trials Registry: U1111-1261-4910 (REBEC - Brazilian Registry for Clinical Trials).

Imaging of peripheral nerve causes of chronic buttock pain and sciatica.

Chronic buttock pain is a common and debilitating symptom, which severely impacts daily activities, sleep, and may affect athletic performance. Lumbar spine, posterior hip, or hamstring pathology are usually considered as the primary diagnoses; however, pelvic neural pathology may be a significant cause of chronic buttock pain, particularly if there are prolonged (>6 months) buttock and/or radicular symptoms. The subgluteal space is the site of most pelvic causes of neural-mediated buttock pain, primarily relating to entrapment neuropathy of the sciatic nerve (deep gluteal syndrome), although other nerves within the subgluteal space including the gluteal nerves, pudendal nerve, and posterior cutaneous nerve of thigh may also be involved. Additionally, cluneal nerve entrapment at the iliac crest may result in "pseudo-sciatica". Anatomical variants of the pelvic girdle muscles and functional factors, including muscle spasm and pelvic instability, may contribute to development of deep gluteal syndrome, along with neural senescence. Imaging findings primarily relate to the presence of sciatic neuritis and peri-sciatic pathology, including neural compression and peri-neural adhesions or fibrosis. This imaging review describes the causes, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound imaging findings and imaging-guided treatment of pelvic neural causes of chronic buttock pain and sciatica.

Identificación de signos y síntomas para el diagnóstico del dolor discal: revisión de mapeo / Identification of signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of discogenic low back pain: mapping review

OBJETIVO: El dolor lumbar constituye una de las patologías con mayor prevalencia en la población adulta. Su carga económica para el servicio de salud e impacto en la calidad de vida y funcionalidad de los pacientes lo convierte en un tema de suma relevancia. En la mayoría de los casos es posible atribuir el dolor a una de las estructuras de la columna lumbar; sin embargo, no existe una escala diagnóstica que permita diferenciar el dolor lumbar de origen discogénico (DLD). La revisión de los signos y síntomas del DLD más frecuentes en la literatura permite un mejor abordaje al paciente con dolor lumbar, y a la vez una aproximación a la creación de una escala diagnóstica piloto para definir DLD. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la literatura de los últimos 20 años en MEDLINE y BIREME, a partir de la cual se realizó una revisión de mapeo del reporte de los signos y síntomas comúnmente utilizados para sospechar DLD. Se revisaron un total de 1010 artículos, de los cuales se seleccionaron 103 para analizar la frecuencia de reporte de signos y síntomas incluidos en el diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: En la revisión de mapeo el síntoma más frecuente fue el dolor lumbar axial, seguido por la ausencia de dolor radicular. Se observó menor frecuencia de descripción en la literatura en torno a los signos asociados al dolor discal, encontrando mención solamente en el 12 % de los artículos de movimientos bifásicos al pasar de sedestación a bipedestación. La centralización del dolor al examen físico, el test de vibración y la ausencia de mejoría con bloqueo facetario y sacroiliaco fueron otros de los signos encontrados en la revisión. En cuanto a las imágenes diagnósticas, la escala de Pfirrmann tuvo la mayor frecuencia de aparición, seguida de los cambios HIZ (High intensity zone) y Modic. CONCLUSIÓN: El dolor lumbar es una patología compleja en su tratamiento y en sus consecuencias en la vida de los pacientes. El diagnóstico del DLD puede mejorar el enfoque del paciente. Los síntomas y signos clínicos y radiológicos tienen mayor impacto diagnóstico cuando se usan en conjunto. Se seleccionaron las características con mayor frecuencia de aparición en la literatura para generar una escala piloto, que debe ser comparada con el patrón de oro en DLD, la discografía

OBJECTIVE: Low back pain is one of the most common pathologies in adult population. Its economic burden to the health system and its impact on quality of life and function, makes it a relevant theme. In most of the cases the etiology of pain can be delimitated but a diagnostic scale for discogenic low back pain (DLBP) is not available. Reviewing the most frequent signs and symptoms of DLBP in literature may improve the approach to the patient with pain. Additionally, it may aid the creation of a pilot diagnostic scale for DLBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of literature was done over the last 20 years in MEDLINE and BIREME. A mapping review of the most frequent symptoms and signs (clinical and imaging) used to suspect DLBP was conducted. A total of 1010 articles were reviewed, 103 of which were selected to analyze the frequency of reporting signs and symptoms included in the diagnosis. RESULTS: In the mapping review, the most frequent symptom was axial low back pain, followed by the absence of radicular pain. A lower frequency of description was observed in the literature regarding the signs associated with disc pain, finding mention only in 12 % of the articles of biphasic movements when passing from sitting to standing. The centralization of pain to the physical examination, a positive vibration test and the absence of improvement with facet and sacroiliac infiltration, were other signs found in the review. As for the diagnostic images, the Pfirrmann scale had the highest frequency of appearance, followed by the HIZ (High intensity zone) and Modic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Low back pain is a complex pathology in its treatment and its consequences in the lives of patients. Diagnosing DLD can improve how we manage patients. Symptoms and clinical and radiological signs have a greater diagnostic impact when used together. The characteristics with the highest frequency of appearance in the literature were selected to generate a pilot scale, which should be compared to the gold standard in DLD, discography

Role of diffusion tensor imaging of sciatic nerve in symptomatic patients with inconclusive lumbar MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To assess fractional anisotropy (FA) of sciatic nerve roots within the pelvis by using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in patients suffering from sciatica with inconclusive lumbar MRI. METHODS: This IRB-approved prospective study included 32 consecutive subjects (11 males and 21 females; mean age 32.2 years) between September 2019 and February 2020. All patients underwent DTI (TR/TE 5800/97 ms; b = 1000; slice thickness 3,5 mm; directions = 20) on a 1.5 T scanner (Siemens Aera). Seventeen patients were symptomatic, whereas 15 patients served as control group. DTI data were analyzed by two radiologists (25 and 11 years of experience, respectively) blinded to clinical data. Each radiologist placed two ROIs on the nerve roots at three different levels. Diagnostic accuracy values of FA numbers were calculated by using receiver operator curves (ROC) and relative area under the curve (AUC), by using clinical findings as standard of reference. Inter-observer agreement was calculated with k-statistics. Paired T-test and Mann-Whitney test were used for comparison accordingly to data distribution. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among the 17 symptomatic patients, FA values were significantly lower in the affected side at all levels (p < 0.05). The FA ratio (FA affected side/FA unaffected side) of symptomatic patients was significantly lower compared to control group at level 1 (p = 0.0005) and level 2 (p = 0.0006). Using a threshold of 0.90 for level 1 and 0.73 for level 2, 76 % and 71 % sensitivity and 100 % and 87 % specificity were achieved, respectively. CONCLUSION: DTI can quantitatively demonstrate sciatic nerve roots impairment within the pelvis.

Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on a 'fast-track' pathway for patients with sciatica in primary care: qualitative findings from the SCOPiC stratified care trial.

BACKGROUND: Sciatica is common and associated with significant impacts for the individual and society. The SCOPiC randomised controlled trial (RCT) (trial registration: ISRCTN75449581 ) tested stratified primary care for sciatica by subgrouping patients into one of three groups based on prognostic and clinical indicators. Patients in one group were 'fast-tracked' for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and spinal specialist opinion. This paper reports qualitative research exploring patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the acceptability of this 'fast-track' pathway. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients and 20 clinicians (general practitioners, spinal specialist physiotherapists, spinal surgeons). Data were analysed thematically and findings explored using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and 'boundary objects' concept. RESULTS: Whilst the 'fast-track' pathway achieved a degree of 'coherence' (i.e. made sense) to both patients and clinicians, particularly in relation to providing early reassurance based on MRI scan findings, it was less 'meaningful' to some clinicians for managing patients with acute symptoms, reflecting a reluctance to move away from the usual 'stepped care' approach. Both groups felt a key limitation of the pathway was that it did not shorten patient waiting times between their spinal specialist consultation and further treatments. CONCLUSION: Findings contribute new knowledge about patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the role of imaging and spinal specialist opinion in the management of sciatica, and provide important insights for understanding the 'fast-track' pathway, as part of the stratified care model tested in the RCT. Future research into the early referral of patients with sciatica for investigation and specialist opinion should include strategies to support clinician behaviour change; as well as take into account the role of imaging in providing reassurance to patients with severe symptoms in cases where imaging reveals a clear explanation for the patient's pain, and where this is accompanied by a thorough explanation from a trusted clinical expert.

Deep gluteal syndrome is defined as a non-discogenic sciatic nerve disorder with entrapment in the deep gluteal space: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Clinicians are not confident in diagnosing deep gluteal syndrome (DGS) because of the ambiguity of the DGS disease definition and DGS diagnostic pathway. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the DGS disease definition, and also to define a general DGS diagnostic pathway. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using four electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. In eligibility criteria, studies in which cases were explicitly diagnosed with DGS were included, whereas review articles and commentary papers were excluded. Data are presented descriptively. RESULTS: The initial literature search yielded 359 articles, of which 14 studies met the eligibility criteria, pooling 853 patients with clinically diagnosed with DGS. In this review, it was discovered that the DGS disease definition was composed of three parts: (1) non-discogenic, (2) sciatic nerve disorder, and (3) nerve entrapment in the deep gluteal space. In the diagnosis of DGS, we found five diagnostic procedures: (1) history taking, (2) physical examination, (3) imaging tests, (4) response-to-injection, and (5) nerve-specific tests (electromyography). History taking (e.g. posterior hip pain, radicular pain, and difficulty sitting for 30 min), physical examination (e.g. tenderness in deep gluteal space, pertinent positive results with seated piriformis test, and positive Pace sign), and imaging tests (e.g. pelvic radiographs, spine and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) were generally performed in cases clinically diagnosed with DGS. CONCLUSION: Existing literature suggests the DGS disease definition as being a non-discogenic sciatic nerve disorder with entrapment in the deep gluteal space. Also, the general diagnostic pathway for DGS was composed of history taking (posterior hip pain, radicular pain, and difficulty sitting for 30 min), physical examination (tenderness in deep gluteal space, positive seated piriformis test, and positive Pace sign), and imaging tests (pelvic radiographs, pelvic MRI, and spine MRI). This review helps clinicians diagnose DGS with more confidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Lumbar high-intensity zones on MRI: imaging biomarkers for severe, prolonged low back pain and sciatica in a population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is often discrepancy between clinical presentation and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of high-intensity zones (HIZs) on MRI with low back pain (LBP), sciatica, and back-related disability. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based Southern Chinese cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of 1,414 possible participants, data from 1,214 participants (453 males, 761 females; mean age of 48.1±6.3 years) were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of single-level, homogeneous multilevel (same type HIZs of morphology and topography) and heterogeneous multilevel (mixed type HIZs of morphology and topography) HIZs and other MRI phenotypes were assessed at each level with T2-weighted 3T sagittal MRI of L1-S1. Associations with LBP, sciatica and Oswestry Disability Index were correlated with HIZ profiles. RESULTS: In all, 718 individuals had HIZs (59.1%). Disc degeneration/displacement were more prevalent in HIZ individuals (p<.001). HIZ subjects experienced prolonged severe LBP more frequently (39.6% vs. 32.5%; p<.05) and had higher Oswestry Disability Index scores (10.7±13.7 vs. 8.9±11.3; p<.05). Posterior multilevel HIZ were significantly associated with prolonged severe LBP (OR: 2.18; 95% CI:1.42-3.37; p<.05) in comparison to anterior only, anterior/posterior or other patterns of HIZ. Multilevel homogeneous or heterogeneous HIZs were significantly associated with prolonged, severe LBP (OR: 1.53-1.57; p<.05). Individuals with homogeneous HIZs had a higher risk of sciatica (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01-2.27; p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-scale study to note that lumbar HIZs, and specific patterns therein, are potentially clinically-relevant imaging biomarkers that are independently and significantly associated with prolonged/severe LBP and sciatica. HIZs, especially homogenous multilevel HIZ, should be noted in the global pain imaging phenotype assessment.

Venous Thromboembolism Manifesting as Sciatica in Two Pregnant Women.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a common presentation among pregnant women. CASE: This case report highlights two women who developed excessive low back radicular nerve symptoms during pregnancy as the initial presentation of proximal venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: The use of Doppler ultrasound imaging or magnetic resonance imaging is suggested for women presenting with severe clinical symptoms of radicular low back or leg pain in pregnancy to rule out thromboembolism and guide patient management.

Anatomical analysis of the pelvis to identify any predisposing anatomical factors for ischiofemoral space pathology: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Anatomical analysis of the hips and pelvis was performed using MRI to evaluate morphological characteristics and associations between them. We identified correlations between the ischiofemoral space (IFS), quadratus femoris space (QFS), femoral version angle (FVA) and cervicodiaphyseal angle (CDA). METHODS: This study involved a retrospective search of a database of consecutive reports of adult hip MRI examinations carried out between January and September 2016. Patients with a medical history likely to affect pelvic and hip morphometry were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 137 adult patients were enrolled in the study (45.3% males and 54.7% females), with a mean age of 50.16 ± 13.87 years. The mean IFS was 20.88 ± 5.96 mm, mean QFS was 15.2 ± 6.18 mm, mean FVA was 12.43 ± 6.98, and mean CDA was 121.27 ± 4.6°. The IFS measurements were significantly correlated with femoral measurements (p = 0.025). These visible differences showed a slight negative relationship (-0.191), and females had a smaller distance between these anatomical structures than males (p < 0.001). Females had a significantly smaller QFS than males (12.42 ± 5.94 vs 18.73 ± 4.48 mm, p = 0.000). There was a small but significant positive relationship between CDA and FVA (p = 0.022), with a correlation coefficient of 0.195. CONCLUSION: A higher FVA was correlated with a smaller IFS. Furthermore, an increase in the CDA appeared in tandem with an increase in the FVA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A single conventional MRI sequence can alert us to how anatomical factors could predispose individuals to a decrease in IFS.

Shear Wave Elastographic Investigation of the Immediate Effects of Slump Neurodynamics in People With Sciatica.

OBJECTIVES: Neurodynamic techniques are often used to treat people with sciatica pain, but their mechanical effects on the sciatic nerve are unknown. Shear wave elastography (SWE) has been shown to effectively estimate the stiffness of peripheral nerves in real time. The aim of this study was to use SWE to assess the effects of slump neurodynamics in the sciatic stiffness of people with sciatica. METHODS: Sixteen participants volunteered for this study. The sciatic stiffness of 8 patients with unilateral chronic sciatica and 8 healthy control participants was measured by SWE, with the participants in a prone position and during a dynamic condition (ie, ankle dorsiflexion). These measurements were performed before and immediately after the neurodynamic intervention, which consisted of a static slump position applied to the symptomatic limb of the patients with sciatica and in a randomly chosen limb of the healthy participants. RESULTS: The 8 patients with sciatica included 6 male and 2 female patients, and the 8 healthy control participants included 5 male and 3 female volunteers. Slump neurodynamics resulted in an immediate decrease in the sciatic nerve stiffness of the symptomatic limb in people with sciatica by 16.1% (effect size = 0.65; P = .019). The intervention showed no significant changes in the sciatic nerve stiffness of the healthy participants (effect size = 0.05; P = .754). CONCLUSIONS: Slump neurodynamics have the potential of decreasing the sciatic nerve stiffness in people with sciatica, and this effect can be quantified by SWE, which may provide valuable information for health professionals.

Predictability of the effects of epidural injection in lumbar spinal stenosis by assessment of lumbar MRI scans.

BACKGROUND: Numerous classification systems have been proposed to interpret lumbar MRI scans. The clinical impact of the measured parameters remains unclear. To evaluate the clinical significance of imaging results in patients with multisegmental degenerative pathologies, treating specialists can perform image-guided local injections to target defined areas such as the epidural space. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the correlation between lumbar spinal stenosis measurements obtained by MRI and improvement obtained through local epidural injection. METHODS: In this retrospective study various measurement and classification systems for lumbar spinal stenosis were applied to MRI scans of 100 patients with this pathological condition. The reported effect of epidural bupivacaine/triamcinolone injections at the site was recorded in these patients and a comparative analysis performed. RESULTS: MRI features assessed in this study did not show any relevant correlation with reported pain relief after epidural injection in patients with chronic lumbar stenosis, with the exception of posterior disc height with a weak Kendall's tau of -0.187 (p= 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRI is crucial for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis, it cannot replace but is rather complementary to a good patient history and clinical examination or the results of local diagnostic injections.